KP Oli's statement before the Commission of Inquiry on the incident of Bhadra 23

In the year 2082 Chaitra, after the Tinkune incident in Kathmandu, all the security agencies were instructed to ensure that there is minimal loss of property and no infiltration of unwanted elements in such incidents. Since the chairman of the Central Security Committee is the Home Minister, security sensitivities and related information will be with the Home Minister, so the then Home Minister has been asked to go to the Commission for an answer. Many issues may be clear from the Home Minister's answer. In fact, on the 23rd and 24th of Bhadra, an unimaginable and barbaric incident happened in the country.

It is not a matter of directly informing the Prime Minister regarding the immediate and immediate events that took place during the agitation by the JianZ generation on 23rd Bhadra. The Prime Minister does not give orders to the police, for this the Ministry of Home Affairs remains a departmental ministry. Arguably, the Prime Minister is not accountable for this. Assaulting the security personnel, removing the security personnel's dress, and taking selfies with their guns was certainly not done by ZianZ who announced the movement, but by infiltrating groups taking advantage of the movement. They are saying that their demands were hijacked, our aim was not this, it was a peaceful movement.

An attempt to burn down the Parliament building took place on the 23rd. On that day, the group, which had put the youth in the front of the movement to fulfill its purpose, created a situation where lives were lost by creating excitement among the youth in a well-planned manner. The arson and attack on all three government agencies is a well-planned incident. The parliament building, the place that represents the sovereign people, the country's administrative center, the Lion Court, and the Supreme Court, the place where justice is administered.

As the chairman of the National Security Council, there was a situation where he could sit and give instructions, but the government wanted to use minimal weapons and avoid human casualties. It was not done because the government had no intention of mobilizing the army. नेपाली सेनाको सुझाव पनि सोही बमोजिम थियो। On the night of the 22nd, it was discussed with the head of the security agency that about 6-7 thousand people from the security agency will be peaceful. Prime Minister's instructions have been given to prevent casualties. All my property was burnt and the private property of others which had been sold 23 years ago to allow me to stay was also burnt. तेह्रथुम जिल्लामा एकमात्र आगलागि भएको घर मेरो रहेको। Didn't the Commission investigate and take statements from those who did all this?

Burning the industry did not burn the country's economy? The attack on the social system, the attack on the economic system, and the destruction of our culture made the country a disaster. Is it possible to promote investment in this way? In the incident of Bhadra 23, the Prime Minister does not have the right to order the police to shoot. This is not to say. Such technical questions may have been answered by the concerned persons. After the incident of Bhadra 23rd, the government held a meeting in the evening and it was decided to form a judicial commission regarding the fair investigation of the incident, to provide effective treatment to the injured as well as to provide relief to the families of the deceased and to open the ban on social media as per the demand of the ZianZ generation. I resigned on 24th of Bhadra. If that movement happened because I was an obstacle, everything should be fine after my resignation, but isn't it?

The government decided on the regulation of social networks, there had to be regulation of social networks! Don't be accountable? It should be! Yes, that's why I decided. The state officials who were in charge at the time have already given statements to the commission regarding the incident, and I have given my views on this issue publicly several times.